Jeśli jesteś właścicielem tej strony, możesz wyłączyć reklamę poniżej zmieniając pakiet na PRO lub VIP w panelu naszego hostingu już od 4zł!




Tags » ‘article’

aero dynamics in the Ferrari 488

February 6th, 2017 by admin

the article about it all is at

they sent a Shelby GT 500 to prison… at the end of the calendar year, to avoid taxes. It ended up in a junkyard, then saved and restored, but they had to figure out what it was to restore it correctly

December 16th, 2016 by admin

Formally called the Michigan Training Unit, M.T.U. was one of five state prisons located in the Ionia, MI. area. M.T.U. had a vocational training center for inmates where drafting, welding, auto body and auto mechanics were taught to prisoners as a part of their rehabilitation process.

Shelby Automotive vehicles (the production end of Shelby American had been reorganized under that name when it relocated to Michigan at the end of 1967) were donated to various institutions, including Montcalm Community College, Western Michigan University and M.T.U.

New Year’s Eve, 1968. The Ionia, Michigan paper, The Ionia Sentinel-Standard, carried an article with the headline “Shelby Cars Are Donated to MTU.” The story went on to say that two cars, a “Ford Cobra” and a “Shelby Mustang” (to use the somewhat-confusing nomenclature of the article) had recently been donated to M.T.U.

The Shelby American issue #49, Dec 1984 had and article where there was an interview of three former Ionia Shelby employees about the Shelby operations in Ionia

Jim Frank, an engineering department technician for Shelby Automotive took a job as an instructor at the prison, after Shelby Ionia closed its operations, coincidentally.

In Jan ‘87 SAAC members met Frank at M.T.U. and got a tour inside the prison, the training unit vehicles that proved to be the most interesting were a 1968 Shelby Cobra, a 1967 Gurney Cougar prototype, a completely fiberglass-bodied 1969 sportsroof Mustang and a 1971 Torino.

When the three SAAC guys left the prison there was little hope any of the cars they had seen would ever make it to the outside world, because when a manufacturer donated a vehicle to a school or prison, the title was cancelled with the stipulation that the car never be registered or driven on public roads. This protects the manufacturer from liability.

A second sipulation to the donation of vehicles prohibits the school or jail from transferring ownership to a private party. When donated vehicles’ lives have come to an end they are usually cut up or crushed after having been disassembled and reassembled multiple times by student mechanics, from eventually hitting the road where the chances of an improperly-reinstalled nut and bolt might cause a crash (and subsequent lawsuit).

In March of 2000. a Mustang enthusiast learned of a Mustang fastback rumored to have been a “shop class instruction car” somewhere and had a few Shelby fiberglass parts on it turning up in a junkyard, T-bird taillights, spoilered fiberglass body end caps, Shelby side scoops, Cobra rear seat belt button inserts, front disc brakes, a nine-inch rear end, dual exhaust, a fiberglass nose panel (laying in the trunk) and a very strange looking high back bucket seat.

You might not buy issues of Fuel magazine, but you can still see the great coverage Luke Ray does online

February 5th, 2016 by admin

and you can read the article and see the rest of the gallery at

BMW design boss Adrian van Hooydonk took Automobile Magazine on a tour of BMW’s design history from the art archives

July 19th, 2015 by admin

read the article and see more examples at

legal stuff

May 17th, 2015 by admin

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available in an effort to advance understanding of the topic discussed in the article. This constitutes ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, I’d prefer that you just include a link to this site, or whatever site I found it at, but if you don’t, I doubt it’ll break my heart. If you are the copyright owner and would like this content removed from Justacarguy.blogspot.com, please contact me jbohjkl@yahoo.com

View original here: 
legal stuff

the smart devils at Petrolicious, they did the perfect St Patricks Day post… of why Alfas had 4 leaf clovers on the hoods

March 19th, 2015 by admin

You have to admire the precise thinking over at Petrolicious, no one else thought to post about this!

Read the article at

What keeps Americans from being tested realistically for a drivers license?

August 15th, 2014 by admin

I was reading the article in Autoweek magazine August 4th, 2014 issue, Piston Slap by Mark Vaughn, and its written with a lot of humor… and he concludes that to get a drivers license in the USA, you have to A) parallel park without killing 14 people and B) causing 72 million dollars in damages.

It’s obvious that other countries with higher speed limits like Germany, and other European countries take driving licenses far more seriously, and the USA will give one to any 16 year old that can pass a 50 question test they can look up online, that has little to do with driving safely, and a operations test that doesn’t judge them in the dark, or foggy, rainy, snowy, or icy roads… and auto renews a license without a physical check to verify the drivers health and eyesight.

Mark points out that there are 35,000 deaths from traffic accidents each year, but nothing done to make getting a license more focused on testing for safer driving skills.

He wrote a funny article, and I’ve been a shill for Autoweek so long they ought to send me a free subscription… but anyway, he got me thinking about the ridiculous idea that a drivers license in the USA is given with little safety testing, and no driving in normal conditions other than whatever the weather happens to deliver for the 20 minutes or so a kid gets behind the wheel with an instructor that focuses on parallel parking and rail road crossings… actually questions 2 and 3 below on the written test as well as my sarcastic example of driving instructors. This is pathetic.

from the California state DMV

Vince Lupo took some great photos at a Checker Convention!

August 5th, 2014 by admin

For more photos and the article:

no daytime speed limit of Montana, what happened to that? Answer – one asshole cop (Ken Braidenbach) pulled over guy (Rudy Stanko) who challenged his speeding ticket for 85mph in an unsafe area

July 8th, 2014 by admin

Neither Nevada nor Montana had a daytime speed limit before before the the 1974 action that made 55 the federal speed limit… and when the double nickel was repealed in 1995 reverted to the original anything goes at your own risk… Rudy, who is easily found by Google due to his frequent legal problems was driving 85 mph. No big deal, I do it a lot. But he was in some area with no shoulders, narrow, and had frost heaves (according to the asshole cop qwho had to come up with some reason to arrest the driver) was hilly and curvy, and the cop and the judge who dissented from the majority of the rest of the judges on the case found that driving over hills and around curves is inherently unsafe because you can’t see over hills and around corners. Appearantly, the judge and cop never do so. Saints among us, just absolute angels. (assholes)

So driving on a 2 lane in March 1996, in a 1996 Camaro with new tires, in full daylight, with no traffic and no other discernable elements to make his 85mph “unsafe” caused an asshole cop to pull over the Camaro. Damn cliche!

You can read the entire case, and it’s effing great to read the legal brief that explains the appeal to the speeding ticket based on the vague nature of unconstitutional, but in brief, the cop, and the effing attorney general of the state of Montana could come up with no reason to arrest and ticket the driver Rudy. SO :

¶ 28 It is evident from the testimony in this case and the arguments to the Court that the average motorist in Montana would have no idea of the speed at which he or she could operate his or her motor vehicle on this State’s highways without violating Montana’s “basic rule” based simply on the speed at which he or she is traveling.   Furthermore, the basic rule not only permits, but requires the kind of arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement that the due process clause in general, and the void-for-vagueness doctrine in particular, are designed to prevent.   It impermissibly delegates the basic public policy of how fast is too fast on Montana’s highways to “policemen, judges, and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis.”  Grayned, 408 U.S. at 109, 92 S.Ct. at 2299, 33 L.Ed.2d at 228. -

A Ken Block and Travis Pastrana interview, from the future (they screwed up the date)

October 18th, 2013 by admin

read the article and see some photos at